Consistency
27The supplied repositories span 2012 to 2020, with no evidence of recent sustained activity; most are older forks.
Accepted player card · Rank #1063
@jeekl
Jeff Eklund
34.7Tier F
Category breakdown
rating-rubric/3
Impact
35There is some evidence of practical interests in automation, development tooling, environment management, and game-related software, but the portfolio is mostly forks and project scope is unavailable.
Quality
31Metadata shows a small set of non-fork projects, including dotfiles and cookbook-jenkins-jobs, but cannot establish implementation quality, testing, documentation, or maintainability.
Breadth
58The portfolio spans Ruby, JavaScript, Shell, Go, Python, MoonScript, and unknown-language repositories, with tooling, configuration, automation, and application-oriented projects represented.
Depth
29The visible portfolio contains only a few non-fork repositories and lacks evidence of sustained ownership, substantial scope, or ongoing maintenance.
Community
50No follower count beyond zero and mostly zero-star repositories provide meaningful positive evidence; under the rubric, unavailable or weak popularity evidence remains neutral.
Contribution activity
365 day window
Playful reviews
Configuration couture
A dotfiles repository is the developer equivalent of a capsule wardrobe: every shell alias gets curated, and somehow the closet has been closed since 2014.
Pipeline chef
cookbook-jenkins-jobs sounds like automation got hungry and started serving CI recipes—an admirably specific premise with a vintage timestamp on the menu.
MoonScript moonshot
A MoonScript fork gives the portfolio a wonderfully lunar detour: rare language, niche orbit, and metadata that leaves the telescope pointed at 2016.
Kubernetes color theory
kubecolor is the kind of tool premise that says infrastructure should be easier to read and slightly more fabulous, even if the visible evidence mostly says ‘fork in progress.’
Repository highlights
jeekl/jenkins
24Ruby fork of jenkins, with activity shown in 2013; the metadata supports an older derivative project but not independent scope.
Ruby0 stars
jeekl/beaker
24Ruby fork of beaker, last shown active in 2015; a credible infrastructure-related project context, but ownership depth is unclear.
Ruby0 stars
jeekl/dotfiles
43Non-fork JavaScript dotfiles repository with activity through 2014; this is clear personal tooling, though its scale and maintenance cannot be assessed.
JavaScript5 stars
jeekl/kubecolor
23Fork associated with kubecolor, using an unknown detected language and updated in 2019; the metadata indicates tooling interest but little evidence of independent work.
Unknown0 stars
jeekl/cookbook-jenkins-jobs
42Non-fork Ruby cookbook-jenkins-jobs repository, updated in 2012; a focused automation project with plausible practical utility, but limited visible evidence.
Ruby0 stars
jeekl/renpy2linux
22Shell fork related to renpy2linux, updated in 2017; it suggests packaging or platform tooling, while independent contribution is unknown.
Shell0 stars
jeekl/mayday
22Go fork related to mayday, updated in 2020; comparatively recent among the listed repositories, but the metadata does not establish ownership or scope.
Go0 stars
jeekl/chef-docs
21Python fork of chef-docs, updated in 2013; documentation-oriented ecosystem participation is visible, but this is not evidence of an owned project.
Python0 stars
jeekl/hydrus
22Python fork related to hydrus, updated in 2016; the project context suggests application involvement, but repository metadata alone cannot show depth.
Python0 stars
jeekl/pupa
22Ruby fork of pupa, updated in 2016; it adds ecosystem and language variety, with no supported evidence of independent implementation.
Ruby0 stars
jeekl/howl
21MoonScript fork related to howl, updated in 2016; an unusual language signal broadens the portfolio, but maturity and ownership are unclear.
MoonScript0 stars
jeekl/envdb
22JavaScript fork related to envdb, updated in 2016; it indicates interest in environment tooling, though the supplied evidence is limited.
JavaScript0 stars