Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
amol GitHub avatar

#1073 · Top 98.0%

amol

Amol Jadhav

F

GitHub tourist

Overall

31.0

/ 100

Roasts

Chef’s special

You named the one clearly non-forked project like a kitchen where the recipe is classified, then left the menu dated 2014—an infrastructure time capsule with excellent archival vibes.

Remote possibility

A JavaScript fork of a remote-desktop project is a wonderfully literal portfolio entry: the code is remote, the ownership is remote, and the evidence is politely keeping its distance.

Cloudy with a chance of forks

The Python cloud lineup has enough storage, drivers, and orchestration to form a small weather system—just not enough metadata to tell whether you built the forecast or copied the satellite feed.

Template for ambition

Shell-based infrastructure templates are the developer equivalent of bringing a blueprint to a housewarming: strong deployment energy, though the supplied record never shows who swung the hammer.

Category breakdown

amol category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Consistency

28

The visible repository activity is concentrated in older dates, with one later update on a fork; this suggests limited sustained original-project activity.

Impact

29

The portfolio shows infrastructure and cloud-oriented themes, but the supplied metadata provides little evidence of distinctive, independently owned outcomes.

Quality

31

Repository languages and project themes indicate some technical scope, while the metadata does not expose implementation, testing, documentation, or release maturity.

Breadth

39

The set spans Python, JavaScript, HTML, Shell, and unknown-language repositories, with cloud, infrastructure, and web-related themes.

Depth

27

One original-looking repository is present, while most entries are marked as forks; dates and metadata alone support only modest evidence of sustained ownership.

Community

50

Follower and star information is limited and should be treated as a weak signal; unavailable implementation and collaboration evidence remains neutral.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

0 active days

Language distribution

  • Python34%
  • Unknown33%
  • HTML11%
  • JavaScript11%
  • Shell11%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

9

Public repos

22

Followers

0

Commits

1

History

Top repos

amol/chef-repo

38

An independently named Chef repository with a small amount of visible recognition, but its last supplied update is from 2014 and no implementation details are available.

Unknown · ★ 1

amol/p

24

A fork with a recent supplied update, though the metadata does not establish original ownership or the nature of the contribution.

Unknown · ★ 0

amol/ggson

22

A forked repository with an older update date; the metadata offers little evidence of independent project scope.

Unknown · ★ 0

amol/styleguide

23

An HTML-based style guide fork, suggesting a front-end or standards-oriented interest without enough metadata to assess depth.

HTML · ★ 0

amol/novnc

24

A JavaScript fork of a recognizable remote-desktop project, but the supplied data cannot distinguish meaningful contribution from simple mirroring.

JavaScript · ★ 0

amol/softlayer-python

25

A Python fork related to cloud infrastructure, indicating relevant technical context but not independently demonstrated ownership.

Python · ★ 0

amol/softlayer-cinder-driver

25

A Python fork focused on a cloud storage integration theme; metadata shows specialization but not implementation maturity.

Python · ★ 0

amol/jumpgate

25

A Python fork associated with cloud orchestration, with an older date and no evidence here of original development.

Python · ★ 0

amol/heat-templates

24

A Shell fork involving infrastructure templates, suggesting deployment-oriented interests while leaving contribution scope unknown.

Shell · ★ 0

Timeline

No accepted timeline events were saved.

Compare

AMOL · 6DMEDIAN CODER

AMOL compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

This page renders one accepted, subject-bound rating-rubric/3 result from the immutable public U1 release. Missing evidence is kept unavailable instead of inferred.

Scores are not a security audit, endorsement, or guarantee of current repository behavior.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3 · aging